Origin · Chapter 2
Three clocks for one body
Three teachings date a change to the human body. None agree with each other, and the fossils keep their own clock.
What if three teachings say the human body was edited — and they disagree by hundreds of thousands of years?
, as reported, about 350,000. about 200,000. about 75,000. Fossils sit near 300,000. A shared idea is not a shared date, and later books had earlier books on the shelf.
Bashar, as reported
A 19 June 2021 transcript attributed to places the engineering of Homo sapiens about 350,000 years ago by the , after hominids had already evolved here. A 15 May 2006 interview, also a third-party text, speaks of an infusion on a scale of millions of years. They may describe stages. They may be two sentences. The official audio would settle the wording. This site does not copy either transcript. What it can say is that Bashar’s reported clock is the oldest of the three, and that it names relatives, not miners.
Kryon
, through Lee Carroll, ties a Pleiadian change to human chromosomes and consciousness about 200,000 years ago, with Lemuria much later. That is a different editor and a different century from Bashar’s Anunnaki, and a different century from Ra’s Guardians. ’s Pleiadians make a similar claim without a single date; an edition of Bringers of the Dawn carries an endorsement from Darryl Anka, so those books are neighbours.
Ra
describes a transfer of minds from with a genetic fitting of bodies by the about 75,000 years ago, and a separate Near Eastern intervention by in Session 18. Ra frames it as consciousness moved and bodies adjusted, not as a laboratory, and not as Sitchin’s gold mine. The next chapter walks those three episodes — Maldek, Mars, Yahweh — at the length they need.
The fourth clock, and a shared shelf
None of the three teachings agrees with the others, and none reads from the fossils at Jebel Irhoud. Overlap in theme is not confirmation. Cayce published before Ra; Ra before Bashar; Sitchin sat on the shelf between them; Kryon is later still. A shared library comes before a second witness. The honest position is that this family of claims shares an idea — that the human form was helped — and not a date, not an editor, and not a method.
Sources
- Bashar, channeled by Darryl Anka. “Reincarnation: A Deeper Explanation.” Bashar Communications, 19 June 2021. tv.bashar.org. Discussed via a third-party transcript (www.superphysics.org).
- Bashar, channeled by Darryl Anka. “An Interview with Bashar.” Bashar Communications, 15 May 2006. tv.bashar.org. Discussed via a third-party transcript (www.superphysics.org).
- Kryon, channeled by Lee Carroll. “Channeling on human DNA and Pleiadian intervention.” Kryon / Lee Carroll, 13 December 2014. www.kryon.com.
- Ra. The Law of One, Session 9, 9.6–9.13. L/L Research, 27 January 1981. llresearch.org.
- Ra. The Law of One, Session 18, 18.15–18.22. L/L Research, 4 February 1981. llresearch.org.
- Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. “Human Origins Program: Homo sapiens.” humanorigins.si.edu. Accessed 28 October 2026.